Saturday, August 4, 2012

Will the incorportation of service learning projects increase student achievement?


Title
Will the incorportation of service learning projects increase student achievement?

Needs Assessment
When touring the top scoring schools in Missouri, it was clear that one strategy they all had in common was the use of service learning projects throughout the school.  Although our school is making AYP through safe harbor we are not scoring nearly as high as the schools that were toured.  Fourth grade at our school has consistently scored in the 60s in both language arts and math.  3rd grade however has been scoring in the 40s and 50s.  The acuity predictive tests were projecting the same scores for the Spring Map this year as well.  Even though No Child Left Behind mandates will soon be nonexistent in Missouri, the grade levels need a boost.  Service learning is an area the school has not tapped into. 
Objectives and Vision of the action research project. (ELCC 1.1)
The goal is to increase 3rd and 4th grade MAP scores in both language arts and math through the use of service learning projects.  Teachers will partner with a different grade level teacher to create “buddy classrooms.”  These buddy classrooms will work together at least once a week on a service learning project.  Students in 2nd, 3rd and 4th grades will take a predictive acuity test before the service learning project will start.  Those same students will take the predictive acuity test again in March to determine if growth was made during the service learning project time frame.  MAP scores taken in May will be compared to those of the previous year to determine if growth was made .  The reviews and percentage of completions of the service learning projects will also be evaluated. 
Review of the Literature and Action Research Strategy
Service-learning is a teaching and learning method that connects meaningful, community service experiences with academic learning, personal growth, and civic responsibility (Shumer & Duckenfield, 2004).  Research suggests that service-learning may be an especially valuable pedagogy to principals of low-socioeconomic status schools, in part because it may be linked to higher achievement generally and to reduced achievement gaps among higher- and lower-income students. “Because it represents an “authentic” approach to teaching and learning, the use of service-learning as a pedagogical practice appears to have the potential to help meet both the academic and broader developmental goals of education reform.” (Scale & Roehlkepartain, 2005) Service-learning appears to have a positive impact on students by helping them to engage cognitively in school and score higher in certain content areas on state tests.  "Service-learning involves students in solving community problems, and at the same time, helps them learn and apply reading, writing, math, science, and social studies" (Fiske, 2002, p. 4).  Strage (2000) suggested that service-learning groups demonstrated increased ability on essay questions, perhaps due to the journal keeping and more explicit reflective connections to community contexts.
I emailed three of the schools that my Principal had toured and requested an information packet about their service learning opportunities.  I also found opportunities in a service learning book.  After reviewing several different service learning opportunities the Principal and I narrowed our list down to three, for teacher choice.  I sent out a survey via email and asked teachers to select which project they would be more apt to try with their class and a buddy classroom.  I also asked if they would like a buddy classroom and if they had a preference as to which classroom.  I added a space for their suggestion of a service learning project as well.  After the surveys were collected and the data examined, the Principal determined that she would like to hold off on the development of service learning and buddy classrooms until the next school year, due to the approaching MAP testing. 
Articulate the Vision (ELCC 1.2)
I created a survey that allowed teachers to select one out of three service learning projects they would be interested in taking on with a buddy classroom.  Teachers had the opportunity to indicate if they were not interested in participating in a service learning project.  I also asked if they would like to be paired with a buddy classroom and if they had a preference of classrooms.  There was also a question asking teachers if they would be interested in leading a service learning after school club.  Along with the survey I included a brief paragraph outlining the benefits of service learning on student achievement.  I outlined the benefits and included information about the top three schools in Missouri use service learning throughout the year.  This was emailed out to all staff.  When the results of the survey were compiled, I assigned interested teachers to buddy classrooms, made a chart of the survey results and discussed the results with the Principal. 

Fiske, E. B. (2002). Learning in deed: The power of service-learning for American schools. A Report for the National Commission on Service-Learning. Battle Creek, MI: W. K. Kellogg Foundation.
Scale, P. C., & Roehlkepartain, E. C. (2005). Can service-learning help reduce the achievement gap?. Growing to Greatness 2005, 10-22. Retrieved from http://www.nylc.org/sites/nylc.org/files/files/114AchieveGap.pdf
Shumer, R., & Duckenfield, M. (2004). Service-learning: Engaging students in community-based learning. In F. P. Schargel & J. Smink (Eds.), Helping students graduate: A strategic approach to dropout prevention (pp. 155–163). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Strage, A. (2000). Service-learning: Enhancing learning outcomes in a college-level lecture course. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7, 5–13.
Manage the organization (ELCC 3.1)
After I assigned buddy classrooms and discussed the results of the survey with the Principal we began looking at the calendar to set up a time frame for implementation.  It was then the Principal decided that there was not ample time for service learning projects to be completed by the end of the school year.  It was then decided to hold off on implementation until the next school year.  In the Fall, interested teachers would select which project they would take on with their buddy classroom.  Funding for the projects would come from the campus fundraising fund and PTA.  The downfall of this whole project is that the Principal resigned at the end of the school year and the new Principal is not interested in an administrative intern or implementing service learning.   
Manage Operations (ELCC 3.2)
I had intended to set apart the data from the Fall predictive acuity tests from the participating classrooms.  I wanted data teams to compare the scores to the Spring predictive tests.  I also wanted to compare the scores against classrooms who chose not to implement a service learning project.  15 out of each staff meeting was going to be set aside for service learning briefs.  A quarterly presentation was going to be given to PTA about the progress of the projects.    
Respond to Community Interest and Needs (ELCC 4.2)
The greatest thing about service learning is that it does not exclude any student.  Special Education and gifted teachers can take portions of the projects and use them to enhance and tie into their own educational content.  Buddy classrooms allow teachers and students to collaborate in a mentoring/peer teaching environment.  One of the suggested projects was to develop a Kentucky Trail information book for new Kindergarteners written by current Kindergarteners.  New students are often scared and unsure of going to school.  This book was a means to reassure and give incoming Kindergarteners a view of what was to come.  All Kindergarteners would be able to participate in the making of the book and it would reach out to new families and students.